Operation nuclear meltdown

Masterplan

• Take over radioactive power plants, rebuild them into solar power stations/research centers which seek to solve persisting problems such as:
• Make leaking radioactivity accessible/convert/contain the energy
• Thus prevent economic deficiency
• Boost/ improve shields against unhealthy doses of radiation
• Provide citizens/ the population with new information and technology at affordable prices

Nuclear weather forecast – nuclear climate crisis

Current uranium-fueled plants don’t even take advantage of the fuel’s actual radioactivity. If they did in fact use it properly, it wouldn’t be that dangerous and pose such a threat to the environment and it's inhabitants. Instead, electricity is generated in turbines from the amount of kinetic/thermal energy that’s released while the sticks actually react/burn similar to coal. That's perversion.
Hence, the term ‘nuclear power plant’ is obsolete. You can call it uranium oven.

 [...]

Coal

Coal contains a small amount of radioactive uranium, barium, thorium and potassium, but, in the case of pure coal, this is significantly less than the average concentration of those elements in the Earth's crust. The surrounding strata, if shale or mudstone, often contain slightly more than average and this may also be reflected in the ash content of 'dirty' coals.^[13][14] The more active ash minerals become concentrated in the fly ash precisely because they do not burn well.^[14] The radioactivity of fly ash is about the same as black shale and is less than phosphate rocks, but is more of a concern because a small amount of the fly ash ends up in the atmosphere where it can be inhaled.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioactive_waste
[...]Fly ash contains trace concentrations of heavy metals and other substances that are known to be detrimental to health in sufficient quantities. Potentially toxic trace elements in coal include arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, barium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, molybdenum, nickel, radium, selenium, thorium, uranium, vanadium, and zinc.[...]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fly_ash
[...]The faster a radioisotope decays, the more radioactive it will be. The energy and the type of the ionizing radiation emitted by a pure radioactive substance are important factors in deciding how dangerous it is. The chemical properties of the radioactive element will determine how mobile the substance is and how likely it is to spread into the environment and contaminate humans. This is further complicated by the fact that many radioisotopes do not decay immediately to a stable state but rather to a radioactive decay product leading to decay chains.[...]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioactive_waste#Physics